|
|
|
||||
|
| |||||
![]() |
||
|
Please go to updated essay at: http://www.drsenator.com/SpiritualConsequencesOfHomosexuality.html The Spiritual & Social Consequences of Homosexuality & Homosexual Marriage I oppose any legal acknowledgment of homosexual marriage
or domestic partnership. As a nation we should never
support any public policy which clearly opposes God's
Law. Homosexuality is an addiction with the same spectrum of
addictive hooks as any other addiction. People feel a need
for it, justify it as not being harmful, and cannot stop
without the power of God working in their lives. I believe
there is a spiritual component to homosexuality which
pushes its victims, captives, and hostages to defend
his/her position and enroll others. As Christians we should be
understanding, have compassion for their state, and we
should support people in their efforts to escape this
lifestyle. But as a society we should never submit to the pressure
of this very vocal group. To sanction sin in our public
law puts us in the position to experience significant
negative society-wide spiritual repercussions.
Those who defend homosexuality and homosexual marriage do so on a
number of levels. They argue that homosexuals are born that
way, therefore they have rights just like any minority group that must be
honored and defended. Although, there is no evidence of the
proposed homosexual "gene". It is true that
some homosexuals may have felt attracted to the same sex from a young
age. But having spoken to men & women who have overcome their
homosexuality, I believe most homosexuals develop their particular
attractions due to psychological processes. Painful male-female
relationships, unhealthy parent-child relationships, experimentation
or victimization can imprint the psyche with a
new pattern of attraction or behavior.
Likewise, choices made by an individual in response to the
various life stressors can open up the heart to the spiritual forces
which pressure the heart to act out in a homosexual lifestyle. I
believe most homosexuals are therefore able to respond
to reparative therapy. Various psychological and spiritual
processes can help them reverse those desires; they can
thereby come to a place where the temptation is no longer a
driving and irresistible force in their lives.
Let us assume that a person is born with a psyche that is
attracted automatically to the same sex, possibly due to a genetic error
that resulted in a reversed sexual preference. We know that
these types of weaknesses and
addictive tendencies can have a genetic basis, as seen
in the predisposition to alcoholism. Even so, many people who
have inherited that tendency deliberately remain free of that inborn
trap by simply avoiding alcohol consumption. One never knows if
one is susceptible to the various vices, thus it is best to simply never
engage the temptation. Complete avoidance of a temptation is
easier than fighting against it after it turns into
an addiction. Additionally, it may be true that
one type of addiction predisposes a person to other
addictions. Statistics indicate that various types
of substance abuse are more prevalent in the homosexual
community than in the general population.
I believe the Bible provides clear guidance on the absolute
standards for right human behavior in issues of sexuality. We
all have weaknesses in our character, susceptibilities to certain
temptations more than others. Does that mean that we are to
indulge our own desires, no matter what they are, and have no
regard for how our actions will impact others? No, God
does not see it that way. That is why He gave us His standards.
Thus, even though a person may believe they were born with
a reversed sexual preference, that particular area of their
life provides an opportunity to overcome the temptations of this
world and to make the right choice to live out one's
life righteously regardless of the difficulty. That person can
go through life pressing against those tendencies and attractions and
become a stronger individual because of that effort. The
difficulty will be made easier by calling on the power and grace
of God to help him/her overcome those temptations. Such temptations
are not substantially different than those felt by the man/woman who is
tempted by adultery, alcohol, lust & pornography, drugs, excessive
eating or spending. Each of these temptations can
be resisted and overcome. Just because the flesh is strongly
pulled by a desire does not give us justification to act out that
passion. Regardless of the passion, we must rightly divide the
Word, clearly know what is right, and act in accordance with correct
Biblical standards.
One additional complication used by the homosexual defenders is the
occasional genetic expression of hermaphroditism (hermaphroditism: a
condition where sexual identity is physically or genetically
neither exclusively male nor female) in any of its variant
forms. Thus, the question of ambiguous sexual identity in a
tiny minority is utilized to justify the choices of others who have clear
genetic identities as men and women. Societies should
not make public policy decisions, and philosophical judgments on
the basis of a few minority exceptions. The
exceptions should be examined in the context of their particular
situation. Rules should be made which govern the majority based
on Biblical principles. Exceptions are merely
situations with more factors involved. To solve an
exception, we must examine the heart of Scripture and look for
over-riding principles as it relates to the additional factors.
Problems of this sort are solved by examining the various principles
involved, and then choosing the pre-eminent one as the
governing principle.
In the case of ambiguous sexual identity (hermaphroditism), either
chromosomally, anatomically, or neurologically, the additional
complicating factor is that there is conflicting evidence as to the sexual
identity to which the person should maintain his/her
fidelity. Such cases are used to argue that sexuality is an
indefinite concept therefore no standard of judgment should be made about
any sexual expression. But, such arguments are shallow. The
over-riding principle here is that we are called to righteousness and
fidelity in our sexuality. Simply choosing to live as a
man or a woman, and staying true to that decision would be the
easiest solution to this problem. For those who needed
more physical support to maintain their commitment to a single
sexuality the solution would be to engage in a surgical-hormonal
therapy. Such an operation should be only engaged in the case
of hermaphroditism. Such an operation or hormonal treatment has no
deep spiritual significance, it is merely an aid or support for the
soul in their attempt to do his/her best to remain true to the
fidelity of the chosen sex.
I do not believe that simply having a sense of discomfort or
desire to be the opposite sex is an adequate justification to
engage in sexual transformation operations. I believe such
intervention should be reserved for those who are truly physically or
genetically ambiguous. Of course the struggle to maintain one's
sexual fidelity as a man or woman is harder when the appropriate desire
does not automatically accompany the physical form. Again, this is
the essence of the struggle. We live with what we have been given,
and we continue striving to overcome the obstacles by staying faithful to
our commitment to turn away from the temptation. That load
is eased by the process of faith. We carry our cross
daily, but we continue to pray for Him to relieve the burden (which He may
do). Regardless of our relief or struggle, we are to stay
strong and faithful to the end in spite of the temptations.
Homosexual Marriage defenders use the concept of love
to justify such unions. They argue that their love should
be acknowledged because love is good. They claim that
homosexual unions are sanctified by love and commitment, just
as these principles sanctify a heterosexual
union. Such arguments are plausible under a secular humanist
system of judgment. But in a Biblical framework, homosexuality
cannot be given the same status as heterosexual
marriage. Friendship, companionship, love, and commitment,
while they are virtues, they are not the highest spiritual-moral
principles. Obedience to God's Law and shunning the prohibited
practice is the governing principle. Such arguments have at
their base the attempt to judge God. The argument of "how could love
be wrong" implies that God's prohibition against homosexuality was itself
in error. Either God's Word is True, or it is in error. If
true, then homosexuality is condemned in every
scriptural reference. Love is not a qualifier, their
passion does not over-rule God's judgment. Arguments
declaring that God is unfair to judge heterosexual love as
sanctified, and homosexual love as profane, will
not prevail in that
Final Court which judges men's souls.
The problem associated with human sexuality is that we are easily
drawn to behaviors outside of the Godly prescription. And,
maintaining ourselves inside that boundary of Godly sexual behaviors and
thoughts requires discipline and intent. Sexuality is not an issue
of rights. We do not have the right to act as we wish. If
we have submitted to His Lordship, we are His children, subject to
His righteous laws, and we are free to operate in the liberty of those
constraints. Such a life is joyous, prosperous and
blessed, but it does not include acting out sexually in unrestrained
manners. There is a level of restriction we must embrace, and
in turn we are given a great deal of liberty and its attendant
rewards. In the case of the homosexual and other rebels
against God's law, he/she is outside of His family because of his/her
willful disobedience to His rules. We can choose to act
independent of God, rebel against His Way, and refuse to submit.
But, ultimately the time of testing in this life will come,
and we will be judged. We all know in our hearts what
is right. When we willfully refuse to listen to that voice, we are
given over to a depraved mind, desiring those things which are not
holy. Such a person may prosper in this wicked earth kingdom, but
their prosperity will end one day. I pray for repentance and
redemption for all who rebel against the Way of the
Almighty. The governments that survive the longest and are the most
prosperous are those that embrace the Judeo-Christian moral code as the
basis of their civil government. As a nation slips away from that
Biblical standard, difficulties and disasters become more prevalent, as
God tries to draw people back to Himself. If ignored, He eventually
extracts His Justice upon them, though He much prefers their repentance
to destruction. But God's Justice will not wait
forever. A time comes when the nation's cup of sin/iniquity
is full. A nation does not stand before God in the
judgment as does a human soul. Thus, the sin debt of a
nation will be paid in full during the span of history. For
example, the hierarchy of Hitler's government was homosexual in its
orientation. They killed many Christians and Jews, because the
Biblical world view was diametrically opposed to the Nazi world
view. The devastation of WWII had a huge effect on Germany and
Eastern Europe. And, just as they caged up Jews and Christians in
concentration camps, so Eastern Germany and Eastern Europe were caged up
for a generation by the Soviet block. It is a fearful thing to fall
under the judgment of a Righteous God. As a nation, and as
individuals, it is important to obey God's ways, and thereby choose
life. For to disobey Him will only bring upon us death and
destruction.
|
![]() | |
Philosophical Foundation | Home Page | Church & State | Bible & Sexuality | Market Forces | Abortion | Supreme Court Coup | Legislating Morality | Reverse Church/State | Church State Bill | Christian Legislation | America as a Christian Nation | Beheading Video Counsel | Islam | Militant Islamic Verses | Creation vs Evolution | Militant Islamic Threat ![]() | ||