From: Howard

To: Thomas Lee Abshier, ND

7/22/2008

re: 911, The Chip, Womens Lib and more.......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuBo4E77ZXo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA&NR=1

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5420753830426590918

Dear Howie,

The idea of creating the North American Union, EU, etc. being manipulated by the bankers, for the purpose of controlling the world, and moving the world toward that end by creating a more and more centralized currency, and eventually taking absolute control of all economic transactions by requiring all transactions be mediated through an implanted chip is a very sensible sequence of events.  But, whether the intent of a small group of men is actually directing this story is unknown, and certainly not proven by the Rousso videos. 

Certainly men have an innate passion for power; and some men are addicted to this strong emotion and motivation of the soul, just like some cannot resist sex, drugs, and rock and roll.  Any passion that is fully embraced can take over a man's life, and of course, it cannot ever be satisfied.  But, those who are controlled by such passions can be easily enrolled as soldiers, tools, and pawns in the service of forces that they do not recognize as their masters.  The spirit world principalities and powers of darkness are in full support of the plans of those who wish to dominate the world by an iron hand of one world government.  Essentially the power brokers and puppet masters of the economy and government are pawns in the play of a larger spiritual drama.  As you know, all this aligns with Biblical prophecy, so a larger play is in progress than just the Rockefellers, CFR, or Democrats. 

Rousso declares that the CFR/Rockefellers knew of 911 (or something that would enable the invasion of Afghanistan/Iraq) 9 months or so before 911.  There are many who have promoted the idea that this was a conspiracy set up from inside the Bush administration.  I've seen the arguments for this theory, and the dots that people have tried to connect to make this argument plausible, but I don't think the data fits the theory with a high degree of fidelity.  I've heard the arguments that the Twin Towers couldn't have fallen by the impact of planes, and that their collapse had to be the work of implanted explosives, etc. but I don't think such alternate explanations are convincing.  I can see the possibility that a committee of globalist bankers worked to enroll, or facilitate, terrorists behind the scenes to be part of a plot to attack American iconic landmarks, but a full, top down governmental agenda, seems less likely.

I think there really is an enemy; but it isn't "Terror".  Any thinking person will quickly recognize and acknowledge the absurdity of declaring war on a tactic.  If this whole conspiracy of the globalist bankers' desire to enslave all people is true, then Radical Islam is being used as a tool to meet their ends.  Regardless of the conspiratorial intent of the Globalist Bankers, the philosophy of Radical Islam is a real threat to the peace and freedom of the world.  Its followers are committed to creating a one world Caliphate, so either way, with the Bankers or the Islamists, you get a one-world government.  The bankers may think they are using the Radical Islamic passion to their advantage, and they may be using the fear of Radical Islam to create a perpetual war that they think will benefit their goals by getting people to surrender liberties to protect themselves against its threat.  Even if this is their plan, and they are using war and fear as tools to get people to surrender their liberties and surrender willingly to near-totalitarian rule, I don't think that such motivation in any way diminishes the actual threat of Radical Islam.  The Globalist Bankers and Islamists are both moving us toward enslavement.  And both outcomes would satisfy the goal and desires of the spiritual powers.

The major question, and criticism I have had about the Bush administration is addressed in these videos.  Why has he been so lax on enforcing our borders?  In this area I do not see the Bush Administration clearly expressing passion for protecting America as a sovereign nation in her borders, language, and culture.  The efforts to support enforcement of the borders seem weak.  I don't know if this is naiveté, a caving in to business in its desire for cheap labor, a compassion for a less fortunate people, hispandering to a voting block that seems to be pivotal in gaining power, compassion and confusion about passing laws that would displace millions of Mexicans from our economy and their families, or whether this is all part of the global agenda. 

On its surface, the border issue is easily understood as a manifestation of a globalist agenda.  If the story about the secret agreements between Canada, USA, and Mexico are true to create a North American Union and replace the dollar with the Amero, then the lack of enforcement of illegal immigration is easily understood as part of the globalist plan. 

There is most certainly a contingent of the government, and business, that wish to create a global economy and government, and that group is going to apply pressure so as to create its particular need/agenda manifested in reality.  And, if people are going to ask for the chains of Big Brother totalitarianism to be placed on them, one method is to create fear for one's survival and security.  And, once the desire is strong, the implementation and enforcement may be done through the creation of a cashless society with a chip that stores all of one's personal financial information on it.

The accusation that Women's liberation was funded by the Rockefellers to destroy the family and increase the work force and tax base is also plausible.  Women's lib, increased costs for life, and the two wage earner household as an expected norm, have both resulted in children being placed in early childhood, state-controlled indoctrination centers.  And, this has the de facto effect of diminishing the influence of the parents in teaching the children their families’ values.  Again, whether this was planned, or ex post facto attribution of social evolution to the motives of the globalist chess masters is unknown.

In the Russo interview, the method by which the 911 plot was planned and executed was not disclosed.  If 911 was planned and funded by the globalists, I think it was probably done by infiltration, support, and distant leverage of forces that were already at great odds with Western Civilization.  In other words, if there was any conspiracy by Globalist Bankers to use Bin Laden for their purposes, I think it was a much more complicated and subtle story than simply putting explosives in the Twin Towers.  The Rousso piece claims we were driven to war by a story about terrorists who didn't exist, for the purpose of mobilizing the nation into a war for the purpose of leveraging our emotions so that we would surrender our liberties and privacy, and voluntarily allow legal monitoring of our phone calls, etc.  I think reality is probably explained by a much more complicated theory